Revisiting Books

First, a note that I was feeling highly self-critical last week for not participating in Ada Lovelace Day, when I had such a great experience with it last year. I just didn’t have anything prepared or anyone in mind yet to write about. So imagine my joy to discover they’ve moved it to October this year! I’m not too late! It’s still Christmas Day! You, boy, go purchase that enormous goose…er, yes. Well. Now I just have to make good use of the 7-month extension, so I don’t end up rushing it out at the last minute. (Yeah…no bets, please!)

Another book I should probably read.

Do you ever feel guilty for re-reading a book, instead of using the time to read something new? “So many books, so little time,” as the tote bag says; and that being the case, how can we justify time spent re-reading anything? I heard a factoid a while ago that I have no factual back-up for, yet it rings true in a gut-check kind of way: That it would take a person fifteen years just to read the titles of all the books in the world. Or all the books in print. Or all the books printed in a year. It was something staggering like that. And while that could drive a devoted reader to despair–how will I ever read it all?–I found it liberating. If there’s really that much out there, well, I certainly can’t be expected to read everything that makes its way into print, no matter how beloved by the critics or the masses it may be.

I tend to be the readingest person a lot of people around me know, particularly among work acquaintances, and I sometimes feel a weird pressure to know and have read ‘everything’, because that’s the expectation people approach me with. I feel like I let them down when I haven’t read the one thing they’ve bothered to pick up this year. (Based on another factoid I have no actual data on, that the average American reads about one book a year. Gosh, I’m all about the sloppy evidence today!)

But if it’s not humanly possible to read everything, well, there’s that pressure off. I feel bad, sometimes, for getting as absorbed in genre fiction as I do, instead of reading ‘proper literature’, as if I’m only impersonating a well-read person. But hey, who’s to say I would ever get to Tolstoy or Proust, even if I devoted myself to the classical Western canon exclusively? If it were possible to read everything, I would feel pressured to do so; as it is not, I feel a good bit freer to read what pleases me, and leave the rest to history. Whew! I was really dreading Ulysses.

More than that, some books reward a second or third read. Look at what happened between my first and second reads of Moon Tiger. The story revealed so much more on the second read; it took on deeper meanings and broader dimensions. The book didn’t change between readings, but I did, and it made a huge difference to my understanding and enjoyment of the story. Perhaps it’s like driving to a new place: the first time you do it, you’re focused on reaching the destination. The next few times, you can look around a bit more at the scenery. Perhaps bits of the story tucked themselves into my subconscious after the first read and played around, taking on new faces and funny costumes, ready to leap out on second read and surprise me. Perhaps, like stepping into a river, it’s not possible to read the same book twice–although it’s you who are constantly flowing into new shapes and directions, not the book. It says something about how much the reader brings to a story, how much reading a book is a collaboration between reader and author.

We sense this on some level, I think. We want our friends to love the books we love, and we’re more than disappointed when they don’t: we feel a little rejected, as if we’ve had an argument with them. Or maybe it’s that we feel alienated, because we realize the books are the same; it’s the readers who must be different–possibly more different than we realized. It shakes our sense of affinity–but should we let it? If we get different results from reading a book twice, how much more of a difference should we expect from two different readers? No matter how well we know someone, we can’t know everything they bring into a reading experience–we barely understand what we’re contributing when we react strongly to a story, good or bad. This is one the great powers of books: to teach us something about ourselves. If we examine why we react to the story as we do, if we compare differences in ourselves between readings of the same book, we can learn a lot about what’s going on. So a book we love, a book we return to again and again: it’s not really about the book, is it? It’s about what the book is reflecting to us of ourselves.

Posted in Books | Tagged , , | 3 Comments

The Darkness and the Deep

Completely by chance, I discovered a new writer I really enjoy, Aline Templeton. I was trying to recall a book I read years ago, and only had a few pieces of information, which is why I was searching lists of fictional Scottish detectives, which is how I discovered there’s a mystery series starring a DI Marjory Fleming! And she’s a police detective in a tiny Scottish fishing village–it almost had to be an homage to little Marjory Fleming, child poet, didn’t it? Well, I had to read one and find out.

Our library doesn’t have the first in the series, unfortunately, so I started with the second one, The Darkness and the Deep. When the Knockhaven lifeboat is wrecked returning from a rescue mission, it seems like a terrible, but common, tragedy for the fishing village. It looks like pilot error led to a horrible mistake: the lifeboat wrecked trying to enter the dangerous Fool’s Inlet instead of safe Knockhaven Harbor. But a sharp-eyed policeman spots something odd at the mouth of the inlet: a green beacon. Someone has set up guidance lights to make the mouth of the inlet mimic the opening to the harbor–someone has deliberately caused the wreck of the lifeboat, an almost unimaginable crime. DI Fleming and her team must figure out which of the victims was the actual target: the beautiful, adulterous doctor; the publican with a checkered past and a violent teenage stepson; or the suicidal high school teacher, just that day accused of molesting a student? Or could it be the on-duty pilot who should have been on the boat, but was replaced at the last minute because he was too high on drugs to make the run? Each victim has several potential suspects who might have wanted them dead, and the police will sort through a lot of scandalous village secrets until they turn up the motive for these murders. Worse yet, it quickly becomes apparent that the killer wasn’t satisfied with the lifeboat wreck, and terrible “accidents” continue to claim lives in Knockhaven.

I really enjoyed the book; I liked DI Fleming and her circle of friends, family, and colleagues quite a lot. It wasn’t too hard to get into the story starting on book two: events from the first book are still resonating in The Darkness and the Deep, and the author gives enough back story to help the reader make sense of it, without revealing the solution to that case–very smart writing. I didn’t figure out who the killer was; I had my money on one of the red herrings. I’m not sure Templeton actually gave us enough information to figure it out–the solution sort of popped up from left field. But I didn’t feel cheated, because the killer was one of the characters we’d been spending time with–we just hadn’t been there for the crucial moments, and didn’t get the last two bits of information until just after the police did. But I enjoyed the journey, and I will certainly seek out more of Templeton’s books.

Posted in Books | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Alcott Again

I extended my time with Louisa May Alcott by picking up two new-to-me titles: Eight Cousins and Rose in Bloom. Together, they tell the story of Rose Campbell, an orphaned girl who goes to live with her father’s estranged family. Her legal guardian is her bachelor Uncle Alec, who gets much advice and interference from an assortment of aunts and great-aunts (aside from Alec and Old Mac, the uncles are all dead or shipped offstage for the majority of both books.) Eight Cousins opens with a shy and sickly Rose arriving at the ‘Aunt Hill’ from the boarding school where she’s been parked for the year following her father’s death. The school was doing its darnedest to make a fashionable lady of Rose, and she is accordingly high-strung, tight-laced, weak and frightened. Uncle Alec, a doctor (and the author’s mouthpiece), has his own notions about child-raising, and makes a deal with the Aunts: give him one year to raise Rose as he sees fit, and at the end of that time, if she isn’t greatly improved in health and heartiness, he will turn her over to them.

Naturally, Uncle Alec’s ideas are all excellent for Rose: he takes away her corsets so she can breathe enough to take exercise in the fresh air; her forbids her coffee and sweet rolls, substituting milk and plain brown bread; he arranges her training in the domestic arts, and in medicine, when she shows an interest in his work. He encourages her to join in the boisterous adventures of her seven boy cousins–riding, skating, sailing, playing soldiers, etc. He also nurtures her inclination to generosity, allowing her to ‘adopt’ Phoebe, a housemaid her own age. This sounded like a potential disaster to me, but Rose isn’t toying with Phoebe; she genuinely regards her as a sister, and sees to her education and eventual place in society.

Rose in Bloom picks up a few years later, when Alec, Rose, and Phoebe return from an around-the-world tour. Rose is now nineteen, a beautiful young woman about to come into the fortune her father left her. The whole town expects her make the best match she can (several of those rambunctious boy cousins are lining up to be considered for the honor) and settle right down. Rose, however, has seen a bit of the world, and intends to use her good fortune to help others. She isn’t going to settle into marriage and family until she makes her mark on the community as a philanthropist–and experiences a little of the social whirl she has denied herself until now. Her experiments meet with varied success–as do the romantic suits of the Campbell boys. Only one can win the prize, after all, and there are pitfalls and heartbreaks on the way to happiness for our Rose.

If I had read these books when I first discovered Alcott’s work, they might well be as dear to me as Little Women and An Old-Fashioned Girl. As it is, I enjoyed them–I’m pretty much always willing to let Louisa May bend my ear with her notions of modern womanhood–but I’m not likely to revisit Rose Campbell the way I do Jo March and Polly Milton. Rose’s author did quite well by her, and I’m content to leave her ensconced in her happily-ever-after.

Posted in Books | Tagged | 4 Comments

Grimalkin

“Grief is the price we pay for love.”

I don’t recall when I first heard this–sources on the web attribute it to Queen Elizabeth II, in reference to the 9/11 attacks. I don’t think that’s the context I heard it in, but whenever it was, the idea struck me immediately as a comforting truth. Any time we open our hearts to love, we accept the risk that someday, we may have to do without our beloved. It changes grief from a terrible thing that assails us at random, to a bargain we strike in order to obtain something greater. Perhaps it’s just another illusion of control, but I can cope with grief much better when I understand it as a measure of love–the greater the love enjoyed, the greater our grief at its loss.

My cat, Grimalkin, died suddenly this past Saturday morning, of an apparent stroke. We took him to the vet, who ascertained there was little we could do for him but send him to a gentle goodnight. As hard as it was to make that choice, my only concern was that he not suffer; the last, and best, thing I could do for him, after nearly 20 years of companionship, was to let him go as peacefully as possible. And as hard as these past few days have been, it’s a small enough price to pay for two decades of warm, furry love.

In my family, when we’ve had a loss, we gather and cry and hug, and eat, and tell stories about the person we’re mourning. This means we generally find ourselves in tearful laughter around a table after the funeral, swapping our favorite tales of the dearly departed and remembering the good times we had together. It’s probably the Irish in us, our tame version of the traditional carousing wake. Thus, with your indulgence, I would like to tell the stories of how Grim earned his names.

Grim was my cat nearly his whole life–I picked him out of his litter when he was just 2 or 3 weeks old. I thought I wanted a black cat, but when I met the kittens, the little silver boy with bright blue eyes claimed me. As I tried to play with the black kittens, the little grey kept pushing his way in, trying to climb my skirt, and generally demanding attention. I had “Grimalkin” (Middle English for ‘grey cat’) on the short list of possible names, and I can read a portent when it’s climbing up my leg, so I accepted the inevitable: I put my dibs on little Grimmie and waited impatiently until the litter was old enough to leave their mother.

Grim was a strikingly beautiful kitten, all silvery blue, including his eyes (they later turned a beautiful golden-green.) When I first adopted him, I lived in a house with four other women, so he got constant attention. My roommate Rachel taught him to run up her arm and sit on her shoulder–adorable at 2 pounds, less so when he was still trying it at 10 pounds and heavier. He was a tornado of a kitten and indiscriminate about claw deployment–which earned him his second name, Playnice. As in, “Grimalkin, play nice!”

The story of how he earned his third name is pretty funny. We had a typical college-aged-girls party one Friday night, and I woke up Saturday morning to a weird noise that I couldn’t parse. It went, “tink, tink, clunk, rrr-rrr-rrr, clink.” Tink-tink-clunk-rrr-rrr-rrr-clink. Again and again. I finally went to investigate, and found the kitten pawing at half-empty beer bottles (tink, tink) until they toppled over (clunk) and rolled on the hardwood floor (rrr,rrr,rrr) to a stop (clink)–and then he was lapping up the puddles that spilled out. I grabbed him up and laughed until I just about fell over; then I picked up all the bottles and put them where Grimalkin Playnice Budweiser couldn’t get into them any more.

Grim’s fourth name was more of an honorific than anything, a title he earned by being an energetic, inquisitive, unstoppable ball of kitty mayhem: the Hun. There were two grey kittens in Grim’s litter, and the cat’s owner kept the other one, a little girl eventually named Hannibal for her destructive rampages. Those grey ones may look sweet, but my goodness, they’re little terrors.

Grim was very affectionate–he would follow me from room to room, puppylike, hoping to get petted. He didn’t like small children or other animals, but anyone else who came into the house was a cuddle target, as far as he was concerned. I know a lot of you out there will be missing his warm fuzziness yourselves. Thank you each for every pet, every cuddle, every word of admiration you gave him.

He was very much my darling and my baby, my cuddlemonster and my sweetheart. He and I had been together longer than I’ve even known my partner, as Ken himself pointed out on Saturday. He was funny and sweet and pushy and annoying–especially when he would walk on my head at 2:00 a.m. He would always push his way in if he saw me paying attention to anything else (books, yarn, Ken.) He was wonderfully healthy for an old man of 20, but he’d clearly slowed down in the last couple of years, and I knew the end had to come sometime. I’m genuinely grateful that it was quick and relatively painless; the shock was terrible, but it was better than having him waste away, or suffer something painful. He was big for a cat, 15 pounds or so, but that’s still pretty small to have left as big a hole in our lives as he has.

If grief is the price we pay for love, you were a bargain, Grimalkin. Rest in peace, kitten.

Posted in Remainders | Tagged , | 4 Comments

Fractious

“Do go to Katy! You’re a cross as a little bear to-day!” said Fanny, pushing her away.
“Katy don’t amoose me; and I must be amoosed, ’cause I’m fwactious; mamma said I was!” sobbed Maud, evidently laboring under the delusion that fractiousness was some interesting malady.
~ Louisa May Alcott, An Old-Fashioned Girl

I’m really feeling little Maud these days; “fractious” has been the watch-word at our house all week. January is always crazy season at my office, with tripled workloads and major deadlines every week. People are stressed, and running as fast as they can, and somehow, they seem to forget how to handle it and what to do from year to year, so in addition to my own workload, I take on a lot of hand-holding, explaining, teaching, and researching on behalf of others. One of these years, I really must write a Crazy Season FAQ that I can just mail out when people ask me the same question for the fiftieth time.

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

This is all to say, my ‘amoosements’ have been more important than ever, because when I do get a little time to read, it really needs to be entertaining and transporting. Given my happy re-visit with An Old Fashioned Girl, I thought more Louisa May Alcott might do me good, so I ventured into one of her adult novels, Behind a Mask: Or, a Woman’s Power. You recall how Jo March supported herself writing racy thrillers, to Professor Baer’s dismay? This is just that type of scandalous story. Written in classic Alcott style, it’s a bit jarring when sweet Jean Muir, the new governess to Bella Coventry, reveals herself to be not at all the typical Alcott heroine. She’s out fortune-hunting, and the Coventry household is a target-rich environment, with two strapping young sons and widowed old Sir John across the way. It’s really entertaining to watch Jean’s masterful manipulation of all around her; as she races to reach the altar before her lies can be exposed, I found myself rooting for her, and hoping that she might turn out to be not be quite as much the villain as she seemed.
*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

We started watching the HBO John Adams miniseries last weekend, and that inspired me to pick up a book that has languished on my shelves for years: The Americanization of Benjamin Franklin, by Gordon S. Wood. This book was highly praised when it was published, and deservedly so. In a short 246 pages, Gordon manages to illuminate much about the life of America’s favorite founding father. He sets out to strip away the centuries of myth that have accreted to Franklin’s image and explore the real man–a man who, as late as 1775, seemed highly unlikely to become a revolutionary. We today can’t imagine Franklin as anything but one of the foremost leaders of the revolution, but in truth, it was a close thing. Franklin was a wealthy, famous man in his seventies as America approached its break with the mother country; moreover, Franklin had been comfortably ensconced in London for over a decade, working to keep the colonies a part of the Empire. Why and how he transformed into one of the most fiery leaders of the rebellion is an interesting tale, and one Gordon tells well. He examines Franklin’s life through five lenses, one section for each in the book:

  • Becoming a Gentleman: Franklin’s rise from obscure poverty to wealth and influence.
  • Becoming British Imperialist: How Franklin’s new status as a gentleman gave him time and resources for the scientific exploration that would make him an international superstar.
  • Becoming a Patriot: Franklin’s years of work to keep America and Britain together, the failure of which led to him bitterly switching positions on the question.
  • Becoming a Diplomat: Franklin worldwide fame makes him a natural figurehead for the American cause, and he is dispatched to France to trade on his reputation in a quest for monetary and military support. As much as Washington wins the war at home, Franklin wins it abroad.
  • Becoming an American: THE American, in fact, the first and greatest exemplar of the American ideal, a self-made man. There’s a lot of interesting stuff in this chapter about the transformation of social opinions on class and work vs. leisure; the divisions that will lead to the Civil War are apparent, as are the roots of our modern fashion for living frenzied lives of over-work and little leisure.
  • This is an excellent book, one that inspires more reading and plumbing of the topics within–as does the John Adams miniseries. We’ve watched the second disc now, and while it wasn’t as entertaining as the first (partly because it’s away from the Revolution, and partly because Adams was an unpleasant little man), it still inspires me to want to read more about the period. I’d like to read a biography of Washington, for sure, and maybe a little something on the Federalist question and/or Alexander Hamilton (played by Rufus Sewall in the miniseries, and greeted by us with shouts of “Awon Buww! Awon Buww!” I love how Ken and I so often go to the same joke at the same time.) A well-researched bit of historical fiction wouldn’t go awry, either–any recommendations for good novels set during the revolution?

    *~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

    Are you watching Downton Abbey on Masterpiece? I’m really enjoying it, despite it being a little out there for the period it’s meant to represent. Some of the characters have surprisingly modern attitudes–when news of sinking of the Titanic reaches them, for example, his Lordship’s first thought is for the all the ‘poor souls in steerage’. An unlikely first impulse in the landed gentry of 1912, I think–but it’s meant as a bit of character establishment: the Earl has been influenced by his forward-thinking American wife. Anyway, that’s a minor quibble and doesn’t detract from my pleasure in watching the program. It’s not ‘good’, perhaps, but it’s gorgeous and terribly amusing, and that’s what is called for just now. I loved the revelation in last week’s episode that one of the maids is secretly educating herself in hopes of leaving service and becoming a secretary–and how that is considered wildly ambitious and quite a climb for the young woman. She so romanticizes the job, it casts a bit of a rosy glow on my work. It’s good, in the depths of crazy season, to be reminded that the job I do was, just a century ago, a prize to be striven for. It’s good to remember that it affords me independence and the ability to live as I want; something of a luxury even today, I think.

    Posted in Books | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

    An Old-Fashioned Girl

    An Old-Fashioned Girl by Louisa May Alcott

    In the first half of this book, country girl Polly Milton pays a visit to her wealthy city friend Fanny Shaw. Polly, an unsophisticated 14-year-old, is utterly out of her depths in Fan’s frivolous world, but she does her best to enjoy it while avoiding its worst snares. She is presented with temptations and dilemmas, and is usually carried through them by the strength of her good morals. She’s not perfect, and she does a few things she regrets, but she is generally a model girl. She comes through the experience fairly unscathed, and does a lot of good for the unhappy Shaw family along the way.

    The second half skips ahead six years, when Polly is moving to town to set herself up as a music teacher, both to ease the financial burden at home and to help her younger brother through college. She is as self-determined as ever, and won’t accept any help from the Shaws beyond their referrals for students. She is determined to make her own way–and again, we celebrate triumphs and suffer disappointments with her. These, of course, carry much heavier consequences than those of her girlhood; Polly has to grapple with some seriously adult situations. And when the Shaws’ comfortable world comes crashing down around them, it will be sweet, sensible Polly who sees them through the crisis.

    The author has a lot to say about the dissipated nature of “today’s youth” and uses Polly’s adventures to make her commentary. She delivers little lectures and morality plays on honesty, thrift, modesty, filial duty, self-sacrifice, the value of education, and so on. All of which makes it sound vile and preachy, I know, and I simply HATE to be preached to. But An Old-Fashioned Girl is the most treasured book of my childhood, the one that influenced me more than any other–more than Little Women, or Anne of Green Gables, or all the Little House books put together. Of all the bright, strong heroines in those stories, Polly Milton was the one I admired the most. I don’t know if I can say that I emulated her, but I understood her isolation in Fan’s crowd of fast girls, ostracized as I was by the mean girls at school. Her preference for reading over parties, for one true friend over several superficial acquaintances, for honesty over artifice–it all resonated with the 9-year-old me who first encountered it. Moreover, when Polly is in a quandary, she goes right to her mother for support and advice; when she’s tempted to do wrong, she has only to imagine how disappointed her mother will be to keep to her path. That, I absolutely understood: my own gentle mother was the highest authority in my young life; I never feared any punishment more than incurring her disappointment.

    I can’t say how many times I read the book when I was young, but I can visualize even now the shelf it sat on at the public library, I checked it out so often. When, a few years ago, I suddenly had the urge to read it again, I looked around until I found an edition with the same illustrations as that beloved copy–and if I could find it in a green library binding just like the one our library had, I would treasure it always. I just loved the book that much. I carried its lessons with me, and I have no doubt that as I faced the challenges of a very much more modern young womanhood than Alcott could have dreamed of, Polly’s example of staying true to herself helped me do the same.

    The book is quaint in many ways, as a novel written to improve the morals of young people in 1869 must be, but it’s also surprisingly modern. The scene that sent me searching it out as an adult was the one in which grown-up Polly introduces Fan to her new friends:

    Polly came to know a little sisterhood of busy, happy, independent girls, who each had a purpose to execute, a talent to develop, an ambition to achieve, and brought to the work patience and perseverance, hope and courage. Here Polly found her place at once, for in this little world love and liberty prevailed; talent, energy, and character took the first rank; money, fashion and position were literally nowhere; for here, as in the big world outside, genius seemed to blossom best when poverty was head gardener.

    There’s also Polly’s landlady, Miss Mills, an independently well-off spinster who uses her fortune to help others. Her rescue of tragic Little Jane is a section that makes me weep every time, despite knowing how well Jane’s story turns out. Although the book does culminate in the pairing off of “everyone I can lay my hands on”, as the author puts it, there are several examples of happy, fulfilled, unmarried women in the book.

    What saves the book from preachy dullness and makes it relevant to girls born a century or more after its writing is the fullness of Polly’s character. We see inside her head and heart, and understand that she’s not Miss Polly Perfect–she suffers petty jealousies and tempers, she has her vanities–but she works to overcome them. She makes mistakes, but she owns up to them and learns from them. She fights with her friends, and she makes peace with them. She’s an excellent model for young women, even today, when mores have changed so radically, because she’s all about being true to what her own set of values tells her is right. She doesn’t give in to peer pressure; she doesn’t let society’s notions of what’s proper keep her from her doing what she wants to do; she seeks to do good in the world and improve the lives she touches. I hope she will continue to guide the development of young women for generations to come.

    Posted in Books | Tagged | 3 Comments

    The Liar


    The Liar, by Stephen Fry

    “Little girls grow up to be women. Little boys grow up to be little boys.” In his first novel, Stephen Fry explores the games played by men of a certain privileged type: spy games, mind games, sexual games, and, naturally, good old English cricket.

    “You won’t cheat will you, sir?”
    “Cheat? Good heavens. This is an amateur cricket match amongst leading prep schools, I’m an Englishman and a schoolmaster supposedly setting an example to his young charges. We are playing the most artistic and beautiful game man ever devised. Of course I’ll cunting well cheat.” (Apologies for the language, but I loved this exchange.)

    For the sake of its author, referred to in this household as “darling Stephen”, I wanted to love this book, but in the end I could only like it–and that only after slogging through the boring, off-putting and confusing early sections. Had it been anyone else writing, I would have put this book aside after fifty pages, but I trusted Stephen Fry to pull it all together into something worthwhile. In the end, I was glad I stuck it out, but also glad I had merely borrowed the book, not purchased it.

    The story follows Adrian Healey, the titular liar, from roughly age 15 to 19, but in a non-linear way. There are three or four major moments of Adrian’s adolescence braided together, and the transitions between scenes are not always clearly marked. These early chapters were confusing, and as Adrian was a pretentious little snot, I nearly abandoned him entirely. But just then, Adrian launches his plot to forge a lost (and pornographic) Dickens novel, and it got rather too funny to put down. After a while, it starts making sense why these particular moments of Adrian’s life have been chosen to tell his story; they illuminate one another and a picture begins to emerge of the vulnerable Adrian underlying the brassy exterior. We also start to see just how much Adrian has been lying to himself and everyone around him–and his lies will continue to unravel right through the very climax of the novel. The boy is frightfully mendacious, and yet, as we got glimpses of his true self, I developed sympathy for Adrian, and that made the rest of the book much easier to take.

    Woven all through Adrian’s story is a thin, bright wire of international espionage–what it has to do with Adrian, or Adrian with it, is not at all clear until late in the book. Once those pieces started falling into place, the story rocketed to its conclusion, and by then, I was wholly on board and rooting for Adrian to win–which in Adrian’s case means both surviving the bloody game of spies he’s embroiled in, and finding a way of transitioning from his debauched adolescence to some kind of responsible adulthood.

    As expected from an author such as Fry, the language in the book is a sparkling display of English at its most playful and polished. (Would that I commanded a vocabulary comparable to Fry’s!)

    This fantasy of England that old men took with them to their death-beds, this England without factories and sewers or council houses, this England of leather and wood and flannel, this England circumscribed by a white boundary and laws that said each team shall field eleven men and each man shall bat, this England of shooting-sticks, weather-vanes and rectory teas, it was like Cartwright’s beauty, he thought, a momentary vision glimpsed for a second in an adolescent dream, the dispersed like steam into the real atmosphere of traffic-jams, serial murderers, prime ministers and Soho rent. But its spectral haze was sharper and clearer than the glare of the everyday and, against all evidence, was taken to be the only reality, its vapour trapped and distilled in the mind, its image, scents, and textures bottled and laid down against the long, lonely melancholy of adulthood.

    The reader absolutely cannot help but hear both Adrian and his pedantic mentor declaiming in the plummy tones of the author himself. The wordplay is frequent, hilarious and very often filthy–as is the sexual content. (Faint of heart, be warned!) The last chapter, a sort of unidentified epilogue, makes it clear that one may put away childish things, and yet the game goes ever on. I found it oddly reassuring on both counts.

    Posted in Books | Tagged | Leave a comment

    2011 Preview

    I’m not the resolution-making type; I don’t enjoy failure enough to actively set myself up for it. But I did enjoy the way participating in reading challenges helped shape and direct my reading this past year, so I’m setting a few goals for 2011.

    I’m going to renew the Science Books challenge. I’ve got plenty to choose from already on my shelves, I like a good, solid shot of non-fiction every now and then, and it’s easy to work in three over the course of a year. It’s a no-brainer!

    I will, of course, participate in Readers Imbibing Peril again; it’s always the highlight of my reading year. If I were ever to decide to stop blogging, I’d still keep the lights on at Bookish Dark, so I could participate in RIP every fall. It’s such a rewarding challenge: I get lots of good leads on books to read, I always discover new blogs to add to my feeds, and I just love to devote to two whole months to the mysterious and terrifying. I went full-bore in 2010, completing the highest level of reading challenge plus weekly movie reviews. I’ll be cutting back in 2011, due to a personal challenge that I’ll be working on at the same time.

    I have decided that 2011 is the year I re-conquer Mt. Stephenson, i.e., the Baroque Cycle, likely with a Cryptonomicon chaser (which will be my fourth time through that particular doorstop of a book.) When they were published in 2003-04, I ran to the bookstore on the day each of the books in the trilogy was released and read them immediately–possibly the last time I’ll do such a thing, given how ebooks and online retailers have changed bookselling. I had a mixed, but ultimately great, experience with the Baroque Cycle, and at 2700+ pages, I felt a real sense of accomplishment when I finished it. I also knew, immediately, that I would someday go back and read it all again; I finally felt the urge to take it on a few weeks ago. When I announced my intentions, my good friend Corvus asked if I would hold off on the Stephenson expedition until the second half of the year, when his own reading commitments would allow him to join in. Of all my friends, Corvus is the one I’d most like to attack the Baroque Cycle with, given certain complementalities in our bookish mindsets, so that was an easy yes. We’re going to make a proper real life book club out of it! I’m toying with the idea of exploring the Stephensonian foothills before we set out up the mountain–Snow Crash, Diamond Age, etc.–but I’m not sure about that; it may be there’s such thing as too much Neal Stephenson, even for me, and I wouldn’t want to tire myself before we even reach base camp.

    Besides, I have some perfectly lovely Persephone books awaiting my attention, and I think a winter season spent in early- to mid-20th century Britain sounds lovely. It’s high time I work up The Guernsey Literary and Potato Peel Pie Society for the blog–another book so close to my heart, I’ve had a hard time writing about it. This will be my third time reading it, and this time, darn it, I will NOT get lost in the story and forget to take notes! I WILL read it with a critical eye and review it for the blog. (Or, you know, I’ll just let Juliet Ashton and her sweet, wacky friends sweep me off my feet, AGAIN. I really can’t lose with this one.)

    Finally, I’m going to work my To-Read list over on Goodreads; that’s where I’ve been parking all the interesting-sounding titles that flitter past in my feeds and on challenge pages. I was thinking one book per month, but I’ve just re-read this entry so far, and realize that I am way over-booking (hah!) 2011 already. So I’m going to aim for one To Read book, from the library, per quarter. That’s four books. I can totally do that. And if I can’t, well, that’s okay–if it’s not one book, it’ll be another!

    Posted in Books | Tagged , | Leave a comment

    2010 Reads

    It was a good reading year here at Bookish Dark. I completed most of my reading challenge commitments, although the TBR got derailed by Adams and the wide world of ebooks. I did pretty well with the goal of giving away books, too, moving some 50 or so books off the shelves via Bookmooch. (No comment on how many came in from Bookmooch!) I think there’s more work to be done there in 2011, and the more comfortable I get with ebooks, the easier it is for me to give up the paper copies. I’m beginning to have half a hope of one day owning a carefully curated collection, rather than the great greedy piles of books I’ve always had.

    My challenge results:


    2010 Chunkster Challenge

    Completed the Do these Books Make My Butt Look Big? level.
    1. Xenogenesis, Octavia Butler
    2. The Robber Bride, Margaret Atwood
    3. Doubt: A History, Jennifer Michael Hecht
    4. The Ozark Trilogy, Suzette Haden Elgin


    Attacking the TBR Tome

    Erm, 8 against a goal of 20. Not my best showing!
    1. Xenogenesis, Octavia Butler
    2. The Robber Bride, Margaret Atwood
    3. Doubt: A History, Jennifer Michael Hecht
    4. A Crack in the Edge of the World, Simon Winchester
    5. Marjory Fleming, Oriel Malet
    6. Uncle Tungsten, Oliver Sacks
    7. Singularity Sky, Charles Stross
    8. The Ozark Trilogy, Suzette Haden Elgin


    Science Book Challenge 2010

    Complete!
    1. Doubt: A History, Jennifer Michael Hecht
    2. A Crack in the Edge of the World, Simon Winchester
    3. Uncle Tungsten, Oliver Sacks


    Readers Imbibing Peril V

    Peril on the Screen: Complete, and then some!
    Peril the First: Complete! (4 required, 5 read)
    1. Her Fearful Symmetry, Audrey Niffenegger
    2. The Historian, Elizabeth Kostova
    3. The Haunting of Hill House, Shirley Jackson
    4. We Have Always Lived in the Castle, Shirley Jackson
    5. Fox Evil, Minette Walters

    I was so-so on the commitment to mention every book I read, although I’ll let myself by on the technicality that I did faithfully maintain my reading list. I like the way Ramona does her bi-monthly round-up, and may try that out for next year. I’m also happy to note there are 14 women and 13 men among the authors. I wasn’t consciously trying for gender balance, but I’m glad my natural reading patterns tend that way. Here are the books I read in 2010:

    1. Xenogenesis, Octavia Butler
    2. The Sweetness at the Bottom of the Pie, Alan Bradley
    3. The Robber Bride, Margaret Atwood
    4. Doubt: A History, Jennifer Michael Hecht
    5. A Crack in the Edge of the World, Simon Winchester
    6. Marjory Fleming, Oriel Malet
    7. Uncle Tungsten, Oliver Sacks
    8. Singularity Sky, Charles Stross
    9. The Ozark Trilogy, Suzette Haden Elgin
    10. The Weed That Strings the Hangman’s Bag, Alan Bradley
    11. The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy, Douglas Adams
    12. The Restaurant at the End of the Universe, Douglas Adams
    13. Life, the Universe, and Everything, Douglas Adams
    14. Gunpowder Green, Laura Childs
    15. The Ice House, Minette Walters
    16. Mostly Harmless, Douglas Adams
    17. Berlin Diaries, William Shirer
    18. The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo, Stieg Larsson
    19. Island of the Sequined Love Nun, Christopher Moore
    20. The Ghost Brigades, John Scalzi
    21. Full Cry, Rita Mae Brown
    22. Her Fearful Symmetry, Audrey Niffenegger
    23. The Historian, Elizabeth Kostova
    24. The Haunting of Hill House, Shirley Jackson
    25. We Have Always Lived in the Castle, Shirley Jackson
    26. Fox Evil, Minette Walters
    27. The Breaker, Minette Walters
    28. Roseanna, Maj Sjowall and Per Wahloo
    29. To Bed With Grand Music, Marghanita Laski
    30. The Strangely Beautiful Tale of Miss Percy Parker, Leanna Renee Hieber
    31. Thief of Time, Terry Pratchett
    32. Equal Rites, Terry Pratchett
    33. Logicomix, Apostolos Doxiadis & Christos Papadimitriou

    Here’s to more great reads in 2011!

    Posted in Books | Tagged , | 2 Comments

    Sunriver Escapade

    My office holds fundraisers for United Way every autumn–bake sales, silent auctions, and the centerpiece event, basket raffles. Teams put together themed baskets (Movie Night, Holiday Baking, etc.) that are raffled off in the big finale of the month-long fundraiser. For several years now, one of our managers has donated a weekend at her condo in Sunriver Resort to the management team’s basket, making that the One to Win–and this year, I did! Our trip was last weekend, and it was wonderful!

    Well, it turned out wonderful in the end–it started out highly stressful, as I did absolutely no planning or packing ahead of time and a winter storm was moving through the Cascades the day we set out. I may be Midwest-raised, but I don’t imagine that driving in Iowa winters has done a thing to prepare me for driving over a mountain during a blizzard! I was an enormous stress-ball Friday morning, and was only persuaded to attempt the trip by Ken’s calm, unworried attitude; he, after all, would be doing the actual driving. So we set out a bit before noon, and we caught a break; by the time we were in the passes, the snow had stopped falling and temps were above freezing. I clung to the safety strap for the nine or so miles between Government Camp and Blue Box Pass, apologizing to Ken and explaining it wasn’t his driving, it was just the situation freaking me out. But shortly thereafter, we’d descended back into the rain zone, and the terror was over.

    We got to Sunriver without further incident, and were immediately lost. The resort is large and full of twisting dead ends and confusing traffic circles, and it turned out there was a critical piece of information missing from our directions. We bemused the counter help at the pizza joint by asking directions to “we don’t know where we’re staying” and then fortunately, I got the condo owner on the phone and she got us the rest of the way there. We got to the office about 5 minutes before it closed and claimed our keys. We dropped our things, toured the place, went out for groceries and a pizza–from the same place that had been unable to give us directions. They were good enough to act excited that we weren’t lost out in the tundra. Then we settled in for the night in front of the fireplace, and then in the enormous jacuzzi, then back to the fireplace, and eventually, to the comfy king size bed. Blizzards? Bad directions? Stress? Never heard of any of them!

    Saturday morning, we woke to snow falling steadily through the pines, so we lit the fire, opened all the blinds in the living room, and watched it come down while we enjoyed breakfast in our pajamas. (I have the perfect flannel nightgown for hanging out in snowy mountain cabins, and of course, felted wool slippers!) I had been worried there wouldn’t be enough to keep us entertained for three days; as it turned out, we didn’t feel like doing all that much, anyway. It was too pleasant to just stay by the fire and read, or play cards, to worry about finding entertainment. We did wander around the village shops once the snow started melting, and since the gift basket included a generous gift card, I made reservations for dinner out that night, but otherwise,we were content to be at rest. (Perhaps the 4100+ foot elevation contributed to the overall lethargy?)

    My find from the village shops–he needs a name!

    The dinner reservations were a comedy in themselves. I didn’t understand how the whole resort fit together, so when I called Crosswater for reservations, I thought I was calling a restaurant at the Lodge. First I called to make sure we could dine there, as their website indicated they were a private club. A nice manager called me back to say yes, we were welcome to come to dinner, but there was a private event in the main dining room until 7:00, so were we willing to come later or would we like reservations for the pub? I called him back to say we were more pub people than main room people anyway, and the pub would be fine. Josh (the politely long-suffering manager) laughed and said he’d have a nice table ready for us at 6:00. At 5:30, I got a total brainwave: Crosswater wasn’t at the Lodge! It was a nearby golf and country club–and I wasn’t sure where it was! I called the pub one more time, getting Louis, the bartender, who seemed already aware there were crazy outsiders coming for dinner, and kindly gave me instructions on how to find them. Off we drove into the icy night on dark and unfamiliar roads. Not be TOO dramatic, but here’s the thing: Sunriver is in the middle of nowhere to begin with, and we were looking for a country club embedded in a golf course–no development or signs or lights along either side of the road. It felt like we were just driving into the night, never to be seen again. I was genuinely relieved when the clubhouse finally came into view, a-twinkling with white Christmas lights.

    Dinner was delightful. The food was good, the service very friendly, and Josh came to our table to meet the loopy outlanders personally. We could have done without the skull-piercing whines of children at two of the other tables, but half-WASP/half-siren offspring aside, it was a pleasant evening. (I’d be just about willing to drive back to Sunriver for their crab fondue alone–YUM!) And of course, the drive back took no time at all, was very simple, and revealed Crosswater to be no more than 4 miles from the condo, tops. But you know how it is when you’re driving to an unfamiliar place: it seems to take twice as long to get there.)

    I had been keeping an eye on the forecast and the road cams over Mt. Hood on Saturday, trying to decide whether Sunday or Monday would be the better day to drive back. By Sunday morning, the forecast was updated to indicate both would be excellent, warm, mostly-dry days, so we had another full day to enjoy the place. We toured the Lodge, which was beautiful, and reminded me a lot of the lodge at Yellowstone where we breakfasted after our adventure camping out on a 20-degree night. Good memories–honestly. Yeah, we froze, but we also had a great time and it’s one of favorite early-relationship stories. I guess people can explain about elevation’s effect on temperature all they like, but you don’t really learn until you’re freezing in a tent overnight, listening to snuffling noises outside and hoping it’s buffalo.

    The Lodge was hosting a gingerbread house contest–this was my favorite entry:

    The judges were obviously people of taste and discernment.

    And I acquired this handsome gentleman from their gift shop (while courageously resisting all sorts of other adorable stuff!)
    Clock not included, unfortunately. They look good together.

    When we got back to the condo in the afternoon, I made a point of enjoying the jacuzzi tub at some length again, trying to finish the novel I took along for the weekend. Sunday morning, we took time to enjoy one last pancake breakfast in front of the fire, and then headed back to Portland on clear, dry roads. We did run into some heavy rain once we got passed the mountains, but it was brief, and it created a lovely Welcome Home sign for us:

    It’s good to travel, and it’s good to come home.

    Posted in Remainders | Tagged , , | 2 Comments